13 Disyembre,2024 Biyernes
18 days to 2025, Merry Christmas
Happy 21st anniversary, Servants of God in Jesus Christ Christian Ministries Incorporated, Rev. Nestor Sadim, Rev. Manuel Soliman, Director Jorge Lopez
No to Divorce!!!
Get well soon Nanay Angelita Santiago-Lopez
No to SOGIE bill
PM for any hospital discharge problem
Sara won’t explain why ‘Piattos,’ ‘Chippy’ received confidential funds
By J.Lo
“I will not give explanation because it will entail that I explain intelligence operations, will compromise offices who do intelligence operations,” Vice President Sara Duterte-Carpio during press conference after hosting media lunch.declined to explain why her office’s confidential fund receipts bore names of non-existent individuals, including certain “Mary Grace Piattos” whom Philippine Statistics Authority confirmed has no birth, death or marriage records. Duterte’s response comes amid mounting allegations by lawmakers of irregularities in P612.5-million worth of confidential funds spent by Office of the Vice President (OVP) and the Department of Education in two years. These included use of fake names in “fabricated receipts” to liquidate its secret funds. PSA found that 405 out of 677 supposed “recipients” of these funds were either non-existent or lacked birth certificates.
House committee on good government and public accountability revealed Tuesday that “Mary Grace Piattos,” who supposedly received P70,000 for medicines on December 30, 2022, has no birth, marriage, or death records with PSA. Two lawmakers have offered P1-million reward for information about this person.
Duterte distanced herself from preparation of these acknowledgment receipts (AR), telling reporters: “I had nothing to do with preparation of ARs. ..that went down to grassroots level… I was up here in the structure and money went down for information.”
When pressed about other suspicious names like “Chippy McDonald,” “Fernando Tempura,” and “Carlos Oishi,” Duterte refused to confirm if these were code names, saying such confirmation “will add to cases that will be filed against me.”
Acknowledgment receipts bore other markings of forgery, according to House lawmakers. Specifically, two recurring signatories identified only as “AAS” and “JOV” – received substantial payments.
Certain AAS collected P280,000 in three tranches: P60,000 in December 2022, P150,000 in February 2023, and P70,000 in third quarter. JOV, meanwhile, received total of P920,000 – P170,000 for “reward payment,” P250,000 for “supplies,” and P500,000 for “medical and food aid.”
Rep. Joel Chua (Manila, 3rd District) who chairs House panel, noted that many receipts bore “similar handwritings, same color of ballpens in common pattern.” He also suspects receipts were hastily made due to nature of errors and dates they were issued.
Duterte’s office previously explained to COA that errors in receipts occurred because “confidential activities took place within short period” and personnel had “lack of attention to detail” due to handling “voluminous papers.”
Duterte , made rare appearance at the last House good government panel hearing last month doubts authenticity of receipts being examined by lawmakers.
“We do not even know if these are ARs which came from DepEd or OVP to COA because there is chain of evidence, nobody can answer that because nobody knows if these ARs are true,” Duterte said.
These acknowledgment receipts were submitted by OVP to Commission on Audit (COA), then turned these over to House good government committee for its inquiry into Duterte’s use of confidential funds. Confidential funds, as name implies, are secret expenses that can only be audited through government agencies’ submission of documents to COA. Duterte has direct oversight of these.
Duterte insisted she would only answer to state auditors, despite Congress’ constitutional power to conduct investigations not just in aid of legislation, but also to exercise oversight over public funds.
House committee has maintained that its investigation falls under Congress’ oversight function to examine how public funds are spent, particularly given that confidential expenses come from public funds.
“They cannot make me answer and say that we represent taxpayers, I will only answer to Commission on Audit because that is the body who can ask us questions about fund use,”Duterte said.
Duterte cited ongoing proceedings with state auditors, who earlier in August disallowed P73 million worth of OVP’s confidential funds for 2022 due to “non-submission of documents evidencing success of information gathering/and or surveillance,” state auditors also flagged P164 million in Duterte’s 2023 confidential expenses.
Notice of disallowance indicates COA’s disapproval of transactions deemed irregular, unnecessary, excessive, extravagant, or unconscionable.
“There was partial disallowance only…and even then, we are not yet finished with process because we can still submit documents that are required by Commission on Audit, everything that they asked for, we submitted ,” she said, insisting her offices have been “fully cooperative” with state auditors.
Alleged misuse of confidential funds has been cited in two separate impeachment complaints filed against Duterte.
DAO 2-2007.pdf
ISKUP! 