Transport protest vs PUVMP sched Tuesday
By J.Lo
“We will march from University of the Philippines ,UP Diliman, España, up to Mendiola this Tuesday… transport protest will be nationwide…after series of meetings in the past days, we are prepared for protest action… number of protesters will be tripled compared to Dec. 29 ,2023 protest as many already expressed sympathy for scheduled protest,” Manibela president Mar Valbuena said .Manibela will hold another protest tomorrow amid looming threat of unconsolidated public utility jeepneys (PUJs) being allowed to operate only until Jan. 31.
At forum, Manibela president Valbuena announced Jan. 16 transport “strike,” Manibela quickly clarified on their Facebook page would be “protest,” alongside fellow transport group PISTON and other sector groups.
He noted at least 7,000 drivers and operators joined Dec. 29 protest action.
“We expect at least 10,000 to 15,000 drivers in Metro Manila alone to join transport protest,” Valbuena said…he added those who joined consolidation will also join protest action.
Valbuena said drivers are not cowed by threat of Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board (LTFRB) that starting Feb. 1, it will start crackdown on unconsolidated PUJs.
“We are not afraid of crackdown as every day, drivers are subjected to violations, including fine of P5,000 for failure to carry with them memorandum circular,” he noted.
Valbuena called on House of Representatives to extend franchise of PUJs to five years instead of extension of consolidation.
“We are appealing to House of Representatives, to our Speaker, instead of approving extension of consolidation, what should be extended is our franchise, returning five years validity of our franchise, as provisional authority given to us is illegal,” he said.
For his part, former Bayan Muna representative Neri Colmenares said Office of the Solicitor General already filed answer, after Supreme Court (SC) ordered government to reply after petition was filed questioning legality of consolidation.
“SolGen already filed its comment and we are drafting our reply, and we plan to file it before Supreme Court this week as we need to hasten process before Feb. 1 deadline… we reiterate our call for Supreme Court to issue temporary restraining order (TRO),” Colmenares said during same forum.
Colmenares added commuters are among petitioners.
“Petitioners include drivers, operators and commuters… at present, despite 100 percent of PUJs still allowed to operate, commuters are already having difficulties… what more if only 60 percent of PUJs will ply roads?” Colmenares said.
On Dec. 21, Pagkakaisa ng mga Samahan ng Tsuper at Opereytor Nationwide or PISTON asked high tribunal to stop implementation, and ultimately void certain government orders related to public utility modernization program (PUVMP).
PISTON filed petition for certiorari and injunction questioning legality of Dec. 31 deadline set for PUVMP, and also sought TRO to prevent its implementation until petition is resolved.
Mody Floranda, PISTON president, has said jeepney operators and drivers are still hopeful SC will issue TRO.
Group also asked SC to declare order formalizing modernization plan, and circulars for consolidation, as null and void.
“We are happy that many lawyers joined Bayan Muna to help drivers and, hopefully, TRO will be issued to prevent crackdown on unconsolidated PUJs starting Feb. 1,” Colmenares added.
Office of Transportation Cooperatives chairperson Andy Ortega said transport cooperatives are ready to serve areas where percentage of unconsolidated PUJs are high.
“Cooperatives who consolidated are now awaiting special permits or documents from LTFRB, so that they would know who among them will be given opportunity to provide services to passengers in routes where operators did not consolidate,” Ortega said.
He added cooperatives can also tap drivers whose operators chose not to comply with consolidation deadline.
“ LTFRB continues processing, and determines how many drivers can be covered,” Ortega added.
He maintained it was clear for unconsolidated PUJs when deadline for PUVMP ended.
“They knew implication of not joining program… there were even groups who went to Supreme Court to question program…we will see what will be decision of Supreme Court, but we at Department of Transportation will just do what should be done,” Ortega said.
He reiterated it is cooperative that decides which modernized vehicle to choose, amid reports locally produced modernized jeepney is cheaper compared to imported minibuses.
“Government has increased its equity subsidy to P280,000… local manufacturer also approached us offering P985,000 per unit…what is important is it passes standard set… decision is in hands of cooperatives… they all have freedom to choose,” Ortega said, as reports indicated modernized minibuses reach more than P2 million per unit.
For her part, LTFRB member Riza Marie Paches said since start of consolidation, at least 1,728 cooperatives and corporations were established covering at least 262,344 members.
Paches said at least 190,000 public utility vehicle units have joined consolidation.
It’s final: over 30,000 public utility jeepneys will be considered illegal and treated as colorum units on Feb. 1.
Marcos administration remains firm on its decision not to extend lapsed consolidation deadline despite criticism from lawmakers.
Data from LTFRB showed public utility vehicle modernization program or PUVMP achieved 75 percent consolidation rate for jeepneys 112,801 of total 150,867 units in the country. This could mean that more than 38,000 jeepneys could be taken off roads and will be deemed as illegally operating PUVs.
LTFRB Chairman Teofilo Guadiz lll said they would start apprehensions on Feb. 1 when memorandum allowing operations until Jan. 31 lapses, adding unconsolidated PUVs would have their franchises revoked and tagged as colorum or unlicensed vehicles.
He noted though that due process will still be observed and individual operators will be made to explain why they chose not to join cooperatives.
Joel Bolano, LTFRB technical division chief, meanwhile gave assurance that possible gaps in transport supply next month are already being addressed.
“There will be problem, but it would not be in all routes…so, before that time comes, board is already processing and looking into possible solutions,” Bolano said.
Guadiz defended PUVMP amid criticisms from House committee chair Rep. Romeo Acop there is lack of direction in program’s implementation, one that is akin to headless chicken.
“We respect observation of chairman Acop…but we believe someone is directing program and that is Secretary Jaime Bautista…each division and unit of DOTR has role,” he said, referring to Department of Transportation and its chief.
Office of Transportation Cooperatives Chairman Andy Ortega said while they respect perspective of members of Congress, they will no longer entertain any applications for consolidation as Dec. 31 deadline has already lapsed.
LTFRB clarified though that while individual operators will no longer be able to apply for new cooperative, they may join existing ones.
Meanwhile, Bulacan Rep. Augustina Pancho said LTFRB under Duterte administration might be partly to blame for problems now besetting PUVMP.
“Based on our meeting in Congress, we can see LTFRB is not really prepared for PUVMP… they didn’t seem to know how they will implement program, it seems they didn’t have any consultation at all with jeepney drivers and operators, seems there was shortage in information, that should have been given to jeepney drivers and operators… fault lies with LTFFRB in the past administration,” Pancho, vice-chairperson of House committee on transportation said.
She called on President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. to further study PUVMP, noting that this would hurt families of jeepney drivers. She also said government has to assess capacity of drivers and operators to pay for new PUV units.